refers to some landmark case decided from the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Here’s a brief overview:
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and use Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It's important for society to understand the gravity of this offense and also the need for stringent punishment to deter likely offenders and ensure justice for your victims and their households.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mould the relief to make it correct to your facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Deterrence: The panic of severe consequences, which include capital punishment, is meant to prevent prospective criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is important in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.
Because of their position between the two main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of regulation.
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal help might check here be expensive and difficult to get.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation includes the names in the parties to the original case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it had been decided, and the book in which it really is recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge for the Judgment within time. Read more
Online access for the case management system for your Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases can be searched using name or case number.
VI) The petitioner is powering the bars given that arrest, investigation of your case is complete, he isn't any more demanded for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him guiding the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no practical purpose.
Thus, it had been held that the right to a healthy environment was part in the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and fourteen in the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all sides of human existence, all these types of amenities and facilities that a person is entitled to delight in with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
Generally speaking, higher courts will not have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your decreased courts.
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only accomplished Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded to your appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )